I just want to complain a little. An analyst called Mobile Experts is offering a fee based study that shows North American operators will invest $260M in filters and TMAs. I don’t have any complaints with the free enterprise of mobile-experts. Yes, to me this is a depressing report. My problem is, is the FCC truly creating jobs here in the US or are all of these TMAs and filters now made elsewhere? If here, then I guess it’s a jobs policy that I should clam up about. The policy being establishing new frequency bands without regards to neighboring interference (or grandfathering old spectrum from modern emission masks.) This is a real mess at 700MHz and there are other hot spots. Anyone thinking GPS->LightSquared? Anyway FCC, can’t we just update the neighboring band requirements when we go for the Billion$ in auctioning off spectrum?
Links: Mobile-Experts.net

















to form Clear.At this point you have a startup company with oodles of spectrum at 2.5GHz, a fair number of launched markets with 802.16 (TDD), and so far lots of debt and not millions and millions of subscribers. Clear’s decision to deploy LTE Advanced in TDD mode sort of is harmonious with their existing 802.16 networks as they share similar bandwidths and requirements to use multiple antennae. Sprint even did some legwork for them with a full out RFP to select 3 OEMs that could provide CDMA/WiMAX and LTE in the same base station. This cleared the path technically for Clear to theoretically upgrade their existing (newer) base stations to support LTE as an additional carrier.





for a network with a launch date in the far future (ATT) but they definitely have 2 devices, one for each network. That should put to rest any unrest regarding roaming and using a single device. This is a coup for these large operators, but not very economically efficient for the rest of us. Remember, ATT owns spectrum in the lower 700MHz, like A, B, C depending on the market, starting at 698MHz (UL), whereas VZW has the hill, 





